Pitfalls Old and New: Part Two

By Sherry Irvine, MSC CG FSA Scot

A Sound Basis for Research

Human nature being what it is, we all find it difficult to spot the dangers in our own work. It is easy to miss an inaccuracy in base information, or to neglect to calculate carefully the best date range and location for a search. It is also easy to forge ahead without good planning, embarking on a search that is unlikely to succeed.

Watching for Errors

Errors can be outright inaccuracies or skewed assumptions. Assess the reliability of any fact about to become the basis of the next stage of research: consider its origin, how many sources affirm it, conclusions drawn, and errors that may have occurred. Some difficulties and errors arise from the two pitfalls considered in the previous article, handwriting and spelling.

Date and Place

When I set the parameters for a search the first step is to go back and review the origins of the data. If the date range for a birth search is based on information on a death or burial record, I wonder about its accuracy. If the geographic area of a search is based on birthplace information in a census, I realize other censuses or other record types should be checked for verification.

With questionable facts there has to be some flexibility in the arithmetic of ages. Women can bear children over a long span of years from their teens to over 50 and men can father children over an even longer period. A search starts with the most likely years and works out, in either direction. Mix the degree of uncertainly about age with age possibilities, and the parameters of a search can be further expanded.

Don't Set Up An Impossible Task

No one is going to look across the length and breadth of England and Wales for a David Jones or John Smith. Logic dictates that we know more about someone with a common name - narrow the time frame and the area and find out some specific details that identify the individual (e.g., occupation, names of siblings, spouse or parents).

It takes some research to avoid this pitfall at another level. Some names are very common in a particular county or region, and at a particular time. A little surname distribution work is never amiss, and is all the more valuable if the source of any statistics is understood.

I know that names in my paternal grandfather's family, Nuttall is one example, are common in Lancashire, just where he came from. Searches for Nuttalls have to be narrowed down before they begin. Searches in the International Genealogical Index quickly make this clear.

On the other hand, I would not turn to the International Genealogical Index to check on the distribution of a name in Norfolk because that county has few entries; instead I would look here in British Origins at Boyd's Marriage Index.

Conclusion

There is little point in wasting time on futile searches. Results improve with good planning; this means assessing the soundness of base information and selecting sensible limitations of time and place. These are old pitfalls that have new twists; we can be fooled into ignoring them by the wonders of technology or we can plan a little better thanks to the many uses or databases.


See also:  Try a Free British Origins search to view results
  Learn more and sign up